Modified PROMETHEE approach for assessing energy technologies
Identifieur interne : 000A01 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 000A00; suivant : 000A02Modified PROMETHEE approach for assessing energy technologies
Auteurs : Julia Oberschmidt [Allemagne] ; Jutta Geldermann [Allemagne] ; Jens Ludwig [Allemagne] ; Meike Schmehl [Allemagne]Source :
- International Journal of Energy Sector Management [ 1750-6220 ] ; 2010-06-29.
Abstract
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to elaborate a multicriteria methodology for the performance assessment of energy supply technologies, which also takes into account the dynamics of technological change. Designmethodologyapproach The approach chosen is based on the multicriteria outranking methodology Preference Ranking Organisation METHod for Enrichment Evaluations PROMETHEE, which is linked to the concept of technology's life cycle by assigning criteria weights depending on the actual development phase of a certain technology. The modifications to the PROMETHEE algorithm are described and the modified methodology is demonstrated by evaluating heat and power supply alternatives for a municipal area in Germany. Findings The methodology is suitable for the evaluation of energy technologies taking into account varying preferences depending on their stage of maturity. It is a feasible alternative to other methodologies which allow for interconnections like the analytic network process. The results show that, based on a multicriteria life cycle approach, renewable energy technologies are competitive with conventional alternatives for supplying heat and power. Practical implications Appropriate methods are required to elicit life cycledependent preferences. Decision support should help decision makers DMs to articulate preferences according to different development phases and illustrate the results in the most meaningful way. Originalityvalue The methodology provides the basis for a comprehensive analysis of energy technologies at different life cycle stages. It can be used to support decision making in different situations and by various actors.
Url:
DOI: 10.1108/17506221011058696
Affiliations:
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream Istex, to step Corpus: 001984
- to stream Istex, to step Curation: 001984
- to stream Istex, to step Checkpoint: 000185
- to stream Main, to step Merge: 000A02
- to stream Main, to step Curation: 000A01
Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Modified PROMETHEE approach for assessing energy technologies</title><author><name sortKey="Oberschmidt, Julia" sort="Oberschmidt, Julia" uniqKey="Oberschmidt J" first="Julia" last="Oberschmidt">Julia Oberschmidt</name></author><author><name sortKey="Geldermann, Jutta" sort="Geldermann, Jutta" uniqKey="Geldermann J" first="Jutta" last="Geldermann">Jutta Geldermann</name></author><author><name sortKey="Ludwig, Jens" sort="Ludwig, Jens" uniqKey="Ludwig J" first="Jens" last="Ludwig">Jens Ludwig</name></author><author><name sortKey="Schmehl, Meike" sort="Schmehl, Meike" uniqKey="Schmehl M" first="Meike" last="Schmehl">Meike Schmehl</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:8F7F9B2CA3A2E5592CC98229C678CEE1BE58F90B</idno><date when="2010" year="2010">2010</date><idno type="doi">10.1108/17506221011058696</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/8F7F9B2CA3A2E5592CC98229C678CEE1BE58F90B/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">001984</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">001984</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Checkpoint">000185</idno><idno type="wicri:doubleKey">1750-6220:2010:Oberschmidt J:modified:promethee:approach</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">000A02</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">000A01</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">000A01</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Modified PROMETHEE approach for assessing energy technologies</title><author><name sortKey="Oberschmidt, Julia" sort="Oberschmidt, Julia" uniqKey="Oberschmidt J" first="Julia" last="Oberschmidt">Julia Oberschmidt</name><affiliation wicri:level="3"><country xml:lang="fr">Allemagne</country><wicri:regionArea>Competence Center Energy Policy and Energy Systems, Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research, Karlsruhe</wicri:regionArea><placeName><region type="land" nuts="1">Bade-Wurtemberg</region><region type="district" nuts="2">District de Karlsruhe</region><settlement type="city">Karlsruhe</settlement></placeName></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Geldermann, Jutta" sort="Geldermann, Jutta" uniqKey="Geldermann J" first="Jutta" last="Geldermann">Jutta Geldermann</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><country xml:lang="fr">Allemagne</country><wicri:regionArea>GeorgAugustUniversitt Gttingen, Gttingen</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>Gttingen</wicri:noRegion><wicri:noRegion>Gttingen</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Ludwig, Jens" sort="Ludwig, Jens" uniqKey="Ludwig J" first="Jens" last="Ludwig">Jens Ludwig</name><affiliation wicri:level="3"><country xml:lang="fr">Allemagne</country><wicri:regionArea>Institute for Industrial Production, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe</wicri:regionArea><placeName><region type="land" nuts="1">Bade-Wurtemberg</region><region type="district" nuts="2">District de Karlsruhe</region><settlement type="city">Karlsruhe</settlement></placeName></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Schmehl, Meike" sort="Schmehl, Meike" uniqKey="Schmehl M" first="Meike" last="Schmehl">Meike Schmehl</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><country xml:lang="fr">Allemagne</country><wicri:regionArea>GeorgAugustUniversitt Gttingen, Gttingen</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>Gttingen</wicri:noRegion><wicri:noRegion>Gttingen</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">International Journal of Energy Sector Management</title><idno type="ISSN">1750-6220</idno><imprint><publisher>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</publisher><date type="published" when="2010-06-29">2010-06-29</date><biblScope unit="volume">4</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">2</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="183">183</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="212">212</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">1750-6220</idno></series><idno type="istex">8F7F9B2CA3A2E5592CC98229C678CEE1BE58F90B</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1108/17506221011058696</idno><idno type="filenameID">3280040203</idno><idno type="original-pdf">3280040203.pdf</idno><idno type="href">17506221011058696.pdf</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">1750-6220</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract">Purpose The purpose of this paper is to elaborate a multicriteria methodology for the performance assessment of energy supply technologies, which also takes into account the dynamics of technological change. Designmethodologyapproach The approach chosen is based on the multicriteria outranking methodology Preference Ranking Organisation METHod for Enrichment Evaluations PROMETHEE, which is linked to the concept of technology's life cycle by assigning criteria weights depending on the actual development phase of a certain technology. The modifications to the PROMETHEE algorithm are described and the modified methodology is demonstrated by evaluating heat and power supply alternatives for a municipal area in Germany. Findings The methodology is suitable for the evaluation of energy technologies taking into account varying preferences depending on their stage of maturity. It is a feasible alternative to other methodologies which allow for interconnections like the analytic network process. The results show that, based on a multicriteria life cycle approach, renewable energy technologies are competitive with conventional alternatives for supplying heat and power. Practical implications Appropriate methods are required to elicit life cycledependent preferences. Decision support should help decision makers DMs to articulate preferences according to different development phases and illustrate the results in the most meaningful way. Originalityvalue The methodology provides the basis for a comprehensive analysis of energy technologies at different life cycle stages. It can be used to support decision making in different situations and by various actors.</div></front></TEI><affiliations><list><country><li>Allemagne</li></country><region><li>Bade-Wurtemberg</li><li>District de Karlsruhe</li></region><settlement><li>Karlsruhe</li></settlement></list><tree><country name="Allemagne"><region name="Bade-Wurtemberg"><name sortKey="Oberschmidt, Julia" sort="Oberschmidt, Julia" uniqKey="Oberschmidt J" first="Julia" last="Oberschmidt">Julia Oberschmidt</name></region><name sortKey="Geldermann, Jutta" sort="Geldermann, Jutta" uniqKey="Geldermann J" first="Jutta" last="Geldermann">Jutta Geldermann</name><name sortKey="Ludwig, Jens" sort="Ludwig, Jens" uniqKey="Ludwig J" first="Jens" last="Ludwig">Jens Ludwig</name><name sortKey="Schmehl, Meike" sort="Schmehl, Meike" uniqKey="Schmehl M" first="Meike" last="Schmehl">Meike Schmehl</name></country></tree></affiliations></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/France/explor/LeHavreV1/Data/Main/Exploration
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000A01 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 000A01 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/France
|area= LeHavreV1
|flux= Main
|étape= Exploration
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:8F7F9B2CA3A2E5592CC98229C678CEE1BE58F90B
|texte= Modified PROMETHEE approach for assessing energy technologies
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.25. |  |